How to Measure MTF and other Properties of Lenses
July 16, 1999
© Optikos Corporation, 1999 All Rights Reserved
Introduction
With the growing role played by optical devices in measurement, communication, and photonics, there is a clear need for characterizing optical components. A basic and useful parameter, especially for imaging systems, is the Modulation Transfer Function, or MTF. Over the past few decades new instruments, including the laser interferometer, the CCD Camera, and the Computer have revolutionized the measurement and calculation of the MTF. This has made what was once a tedious and involved process into virtually an instantaneous measurement.
This booklet is designed to provide insight into the theory and practice of measuring the Modulation Transfer Function and related quantities. While a booklet of this size cannot begin to address all the intricacies and subtleties of testing, it is intended to provide a foundation for understanding, and to introduce the reader to the fundamentals of testing. Various tests and test techniques are described in detail and in concept.
Four articles by Optikos staff have been adapted for this booklet:
1. “Why Measure MTF?” identifies the many reasons for the popularity of MTF as a measured quantity and describes the relationship between MTF measurement and other technologies.
2. “Geometric Lens Measurement” is an article that summarizes the field of geometric lens measurement (noninterferometric measurement), and the recent advances which have brought new attention to traditional testing. Discussed in this article is nodal testing, focal length testing, distortion testing, and field curvature measurement. A standard nodal bench is described and the concept of Tbars introduced for new users. The conclusion of the article discusses resolution and contrast testing, which leads into the next article on MTF testing.
3. “The Measurement of MTF” is the second installation of the series of articles on lens testing. This installation focuses exclusively on MTF testing, including its roles, current technologies, traditional practices, and special 4
applications of MTF testing. This article provides the foundation for conceptual understanding of MTF measurement.
4. “The Modulation Transfer Function” is an indepth discussion of the theories of MTF measurement instruments. This section is extracted from short course notes.
In addition, a glossary of terms commonly used in optical testing is supplied, as well as a list of reference sources for further reading.
Further inquiries regarding test theory, general test techniques and application specifics should be directed to Optikos Corporation. Optikos is the leader in the area of MTF measurement technologies and offers a full product line designed to meet virtually all measurement requirements. 5
Table of Contents
Introduction 3
Why Measure MTF? 7
Adapted from an article appearing in Optics and Photonics News,
June 1990
Geometric Lens Measurement 11
Adapted from the August 1989 issue of Photonics Spectra,
© Laurin Publishing Company, Inc.
Lens Testing: The Measurement of MTF 23
Adapted from the September 1989 issue of Photonics Spectra,
© Laurin Publishing Company, Inc.
Modulation Transfer Function 33
Adapted from the Short Course Notes of the Optical Society of America Technical Workshop, (December 1989, SheratonTara, Framingham, MA)
Glossary of Common Terms in Optical System Measurement 57
References 63 6 7
Why Measure MTF?
Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) has been associated with the measurement of the performance of optical systems from the initial introduction of linear system analysis to this field. As the demand for higher quality, higher resolution optical systems has become prevalent, both designers and metrology scientists have begun investigating MTF as a mutual mode of optical system characterization. This article serves to identify the reasons for specification and measurement of MTF as a system characterization tool.
MTF is a direct and quantitative measure of image quality.
Most optical systems are expected to perform to a predetermined level of image integrity. Photographic optics, photolithographic optics, contact lenses, video systems, fax and copy optics, and compact disk lenses only sample the list of such optical systems. A convenient measure of this quality level is the ability of the optical system to transfer various levels of detail from object to image. Performance is measured in terms of contrast (degrees of gray) or modulation, and is related to the degradation of the image of a perfect source produced by the lens.
The MTF describes the image structure as a function of its spatial frequencies, most commonly produced by Fourier transforming the image spatial distribution or spread function. Therefore, the MTF provides simple presentation of image structure information similar in form and interpretation to audio frequency response. The various frequency components can be isolated for specific evaluation.
MTF can be related to end use applications.
Frequently, imaging systems are designed to project or capture detailed components in the object or image. Applications which rely upon image integrity or resolution ability can utilize MTF as a measure of performance at a critical dimension, such as a line width or pixel resolution or retinal sensor spacing. Optical systems from low resolution hand 8
magnifiers to the most demanding photographic or lithographic lenses relate image size and structure to the end application requirement.
For example, video imaging systems must be designed to consider the image size pro duced by the lens relative to the array pixel size and location. An array pixel width of 6 microns corresponds to a cutoff frequency of 83 lp/mm. In most cases, attempting to resolve beyond this limit is impossible; therefore designing a lens which maintains the high MTF out to this cutoff frequency is appropriate for this application. Specifying performance of a lens beyond this frequency is superfluous.
FIGURE 1. A typical MTF measurement instrument will allow full freedom to create a test environment exactly as the design environment, including spectral filtering, offaxis evaluation, conjugate matching, and image plane movement. 9
MTF is ideal for modeling concatenated systems.
MTF is analogous to electrical frequency response, and therefore allows for modeling of optical systems using linear system theory. Optical systems employing numerous stages (i.e. lenses, film, the eye) have a system MTF equal to the product of the MTF of the individual stages, allowing the expected system performance to be gauged by subsystem characterization. Proper concatenation requires that certain mathematical validity conditions, such as pupil matching and image relaying, be met, however.
MTF testing is objective and universal.
The influence of the test engineer is minimized with MTF testing, as human judgments of contrast, resolution or image quality are not required. Under the same test conditions, the polychromatic MTF of a lens can be compared to the polychromatic MTF of a design, or to another instrument. Consequently, no standardization or interpretation difficulties arise with MTF specification and testing.
MTF allows system testing in the exact application environment.
Since MTF testing is performed on the image or wavefront produced by an optical system, the parameters which influence lens performance and design can be recreated exactly in the test of the lens. Field angle positions, conjugate ratios, spectral regions, and image plane architecture can all be modeled in the test of an optical system. For example, the characterization of a double Gauss lens at finite conjugates can be easily performed and compared to design expectations or application requirements.
MTF provides the most direct method of measuring integrated polychromatic performance of optical systems.
Most commercial instruments dedicated to measuring MTF readily determine polychromatic MTF. The test spectrum can be tuned to the polychromatic design spectrum using photopic filters, infrared bandpass filters, or color filters, for example. Glass substitutions which share the same index of refraction at one wavelength but have different dispersions can severely affect performance of a polychromatic optical system. 10
Monochromatic testing of such a system may not uncover the substitution; polychromatic
MTF testing will expose the fabrication error.
MTFs can be accurately predicted and toleranced with lens design software.
Virtually all lens design software today allows graphical depiction and subsequent tolerancing of polychromatic MTF. Lens design software programs calculate the system MTF either through the autocorrelation of the exit pupil wavefront function or by Fourier transforming the point spread function, which is calculated by Fourier transforming the pupil wavefront. Polychromatic MTF is computed by vector addition of the mono chromatic MTF and phase function. These methods for calculating MTF are also used with phase measuring interferometers to calculate the MTF of relatively well corrected monochromatic optical systems.
MTF measurement instruments provide testing versatility.
Numerous other tests can be performed on a standard MTF test instrument. Field curvature, distortion, and blur spot size are parameters relating to image characterization, and are therefore capable of quantification with MTF metrology equipment. MTF testing offers the engineer and test technician a method for directly measuring the image features that are related to overall system performance. It is a welldeveloped and understood concept and bridges the gap between the lens designers, optical fabricators, and metrology engineers. 11
Geometric Lens Measurement
Introduction to Geometric Lens Measurement
The characterization of the performance of optical systems and components today has become as difficult a task as their actual design and manufacture. The increasing number of optical and mechanical specifications, combined with the more exacting nature of optical design in recent products, are driving the demand for highly detailed measurements.
This proliferation of performance requirements presents many challenges to the test engineer and requires a diverse and flexible set of tools and test methods. Table 1 lists several types of measurements customarily made on various optical systems.
Rev. 2.0 #404001 2 3
Optical System: Specification Types: 
Focal length, back focal length, blur spot size 
Achromatic Doublet 
Focal length; blur spot size onaxis, midfield, and fully off axis 
Double Gauss Lens 
Magnification, distortion, conjugate distances (1:1, 2:1, 4:1), MTF on and offaxis 
Photographic Objective 
Focal length, blur spot size, distortion, chromatic aberrations, field curvature, stray light, aerial image resolution, MTF across film size 
Laser Collimating Objective 
Focal length, wavefront error 
Selfoc Lens Array 
Total conjugates, focal length, MTF 
FTheta Scan Lens 
Focal length, blur spot size, distortion, field shape, MTF across entire field, resolution 
Table 1: Optical systems and parameters which require measurement
As the table shows, the wide variety of optical systems have an equally wide number of required measurements. In recent years, there has been an emphasis placed on wavefront (interferometric) testing for characterization of optics. This is certainly warranted for the highest quality diffraction limited laser systems, but is inappropriate for many optical systems, particularly those requiring polychromatic wide field imaging.
This article reviews the noninterferometric metrology techniques and requirements, those which require direct analysis of the image rather than the wavefront. This category of measurements can be referred to as geometric lens measurements.
The Basics of Geometric Lens Measurement
Geometric Lens Measurement consists of two major components — nodal testing, performed on a nodal or lens bench, and resolution/contrast testing.
Nodal testing is the measurement of the properties of the lens and of the image formed by the lens. These include:
effective focal length and f/#;
blur spot size;
back focal length,
distortion (radial and grid),
field curvature (sagittal and tangential),
spherical aberration,
coma,
astigmatism,
longitudinal and lateral color,
magnification
vignetting, and
object/image distances and nodal point separations.
Included in this division of nodal testing are star, Ronchi, and knifeedge testing. These established techniques for examining blur patterns reveal many pertinent properties of the lens, such as decentered or tilted internal components, in addition to the types and amounts of aberrations present.
Resolution/contrast testing determines the ability of the lens to resolve varying levels of detail. The most prevalent measurement of this type is Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) analysis, which determines the amount of image contrast as a function of spatial frequency, normalized to 100% at zero frequency. A detailed discussion of MTF metrology appears in the second installment of this series.
The Features and Accuracies of Geometric Lens Measurement
The primary benefit of Geometric Lens Measurement is that the optical system is tested in the exact same configuration in which it is used. Whether it is an infinite conjugate system or a finite conjugate system (fixed object distance), flat plane or curved, onaxis or vignetted offaxis, wide open or stopped down, the image is produced under exactly the same set of conditions as when it is in use. Polychromatic testing can be simply accomplished with appropriate sources and filters.
For most optical systems and components measured today, interferometric testing can provide much information about the lens under test, but may not provide full characterization regarding use in the final environment. For this information, Geometric Lens Measurement is required. As an example, consider measurement of a photographic telephoto lens for a 35 mm camera.
A monochromatic interferometric test of the optical system at the working conjugates will provide information regarding the emerging wavefront characteristics. However, the pertinent information required is the polychromatic performance of the objective over a substantial object field (a 35mm format negative), a good measure of the system’s distortion, the blur quality (size and shape) onaxis and offaxis, an accurate measure of the focal length, and the integrated polychromatic resolution ability of the lens. It is very difficult to configure an interferometer for the wide field nodal measurements desired.
As a second example, consider the problem of testing an ftheta scan lens (flatplane line generation lens). While in most cases the wavefront could be readily characterized with an interferometer, measurement of the deviation of ftheta performance (distortion), and field shape in several radial directions is readily accomplished geometrically. Accurate measurement of focal length is also of critical importance in this instance.
The accuracies required in these two examples illustrate the versatility that is available in Geometric Lens Measurement instrumentation. In the first example, the image is compared to the properties of photographic emulsion or sensor arrays, while a scan lens normally requires high precision for all the measurements. A 5% variation of a singlet focal length (typical catalog specification) compounded five times in a multielement system can easily cause the magnification to vary 20%. Instrumentation must be able to measure lens parameters with this large variation to the same accuracies (e.g. 1% on efl) of the ftheta lens, which may exhibit a 2% total variation. This describes the inverse relationship between Geometric Lens Measurement and image quality: the poorer quality optics require more from Geometric Lens Measurement instrumentation than higher quality or diffractionlimited optics.
Virtually all nodal testing is accomplished on nodal benches — instruments designed to locate and position the lensundertest relative to its cardinal points. All lenses have three pairs of cardinal points: front and rear focal points, front and rear principal planes, and front and rear nodal points. Figure 2 depicts a classic nodal bench.
Figure 2 – Nodal Bench
The nodal bench is designed to place the lens under test so that the rear nodal point of the lens can be positioned directly over the axis of rotation of the rotary bearing. When this condition is achieved, the lens is said to be ‘Gaussed’. Rotation of the lens will not alter the position of the image within the microscope due to a firstorder property of all lenses — light rays aimed at the front nodal point of the lens will exit from the second nodal point at the same angle. Therefore, when the lens is rotated about the second nodal point the image will remain on the mechanical axis of the nodal bench (provided there is no distortion in the lens, and the rays are not vignetted).
The TBar maintains flatplane imaging as the lens is rotated offaxis. The image conjugate (the distance between the rear nodal point and the rear focal point) will lengthen by a distance LTravel(), given by the expression: L _{travel} = d secØd
Figure 3 – TBar
Here L _{travel} is the additional longitudinal travel required, Ø is the offaxis rotation angle, and d _{i} is the axial image conjugate as defined by:
d _{i} =f(1+M)
In the above expression f is the lens focal length and M is the magnification. Full plane toplane imaging is achieved by placing a corresponding TBar in object space and moving a pinhole source in a similar manner. This is referred to as finite conjugate testing.
The microscope head allows the operator to view the image, either visually or with electronic enhancement, while manipulating the motion of the nodal bench. The following measurements can be made using a nodal bench:
Focal Length – The distance from the rear nodal point to the focus plane is the focal length of the lens. Most nodal benches use preset micrometers to measure the focal length directly from the position of the nodal bearing axis of rotation.
Field Curvature – The amount of required refocus of the image as a function of angle is the field curvature. Sagittal and tangential curvatures can be individually monitored by inserting slits in the lens pupil. The lens must be properly Gaussed for field curvature measurement.
Distortion – The lateral movement of the image of a Gaussed lens as it is rotated offaxis is a measure of the distortion, and is usually reported as a percentage of the focal length.
Back or Flange Focal Length – The distances from the rear lens vertex or some mechanical surface to the focal plane are the back and flange focal lengths.
Magnification and Object/Image Conjugate Distance – Magnification is measured by analyzing the image size compared to the source, which is usually a pair of oriented slits. Conjugates and the total track are directly measured, and focal length can be mathemati cally determined if the nodal point separations are also found.
Blur Spot Size and Shape – The blur is measured using the reticle cross hairs of the mi croscope. For example, Airy disk ring diameters and the amount of astigmatism can be directly measured using this technique. The length and separation of the sagittal and tangential lines of an astigmatic image can be found by defocusing the image plane to concentrate upon each individually.
Star and KnifeEdge Testing
Knifeedge (or Foucalt) and star testing methods have been well established over the past few decades. Star testing is the visual examination of the image produced by the lens of a point source and was the basis for the development of the nodal bench. During the star testing procedure, the departure from a perfect diffraction pattern (Airy disk rings) or coloring of the image indicates to a trained observer the presence of aberrations. The operator can then characterize and quantify the combinations and relative contributions of the aberrations.
Unfortunately, individual aberrations, such as third order coma, are rarely seen in isolation. More frequently, the operator will find a combination of aberrations, such as spherical, astigmatism, and longitudinal chromatic. Figure 4 shows the appearance of typical star test images.
Figure 4 – Star Test Images of Lenses with Aberrations
A nodal bench configured for star testing can readily be modified to allow for both Ronchi and knifeedge testing. These tests allow the operator to visualize zonal defects in the optical system and serve as direct links between wavefront testing and image examination.
Resolution/Contrast Testing
Resolution/contrast testing is the second major component of Geometric Lens Measurement. Recent advances in optical products and fabrication technologies have made resolution a virtual optical requirement. Some common resolution specifications are:
System  Resolution 
FAX machine 
125 ∝m 
Human Eye 
H 16 ∝m (at retina)

f/8 Process Lens  2.5 ∝m 
Scanner Lens 
1 ∝m 
Microlithographic Optics 
,0.5 ∝m 
In its simplest form, resolution testing takes the form of an ophthalmic chart — a series of figures, each representing various spatial detail levels, is placed on a page and viewed. In addition to the detail levels, the orientation of the figures (for example, the large letter ‘E’ on the ophthalmic chart) can supply information on the astigmatism of the observer.
The Aerial Resolution Chart, better known as the 1951 Air Force Chart, is a series of vertical and horizontal bars, spaced with a 50% lightdark duty cycle, wound into clusters of groups and elements. A mask of this chart is used as an object in the nodal bench. The lens under test is positioned to create a real image of the resolution chart, which is examined by the operator under high magnification. The spatial frequency is related to the group number and element number on the chart by the relationship:
Frequency(lp / mm) = 2{Group +(Element1)6 }
where Frequency is measured in line pairs (cycles of darklight) per millimeter. The operator merely distinguishes the point (in terms of groups and elements) where resolution becomes spurious or lost (when the bars and spaces are unidentifiably blended), multiplies by the magnification of the lens being tested, and computes the limiting aerial resolution in lp/mm.
The resolution target provides valuable information regarding the resolution characteristics of a lens. Unfortunately, it does not provide discrete methods for discerning relative levels of contrast. High resolution does not always equate to high contrast! Contrast, or ‘modulation’, is the relationship between the maximum intensity and the minimum intensity of the image (darklight) or the degree of grey.
Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)
Over the past 25 years, the concept of the optical transfer function (OTF) has gained popularity. The advent of the computer made both design and testing using OTF and MTF (the magnitude of OTF) a reality: lens design programs can now readily predict polychromatic OTF for a completed optical system and match the results against new measurement equipment.
The main benefit of MTF testing is that it is nonsubjective and universal. The test engineer is not required to make judgments of contrast, resolution, or image quality. Therefore, under the same conditions, the polychromatic MTF of the lens can be directly compared to the polychromatic MTF of a design, or to another measurement instrument.
As both consumer and industrial equipment require increasingly fine levels of contrast, there exists a great need for constant rather than subjective measurements of contrast. This requirement has led to the popularity of MTF in both government and industrial product specifications.
More details on MTF and the role of MTF measurements on the characterization of optics, including UV and IR optics, appear in the next section.
Geometric Lens Measurement is the family of testing methods that use direct analysis of the image, rather than of the wavefront. The advantages of this approach lie in their ability to reproduce the operating conditions in the test environment. Geometric Lens Measurement consists of two components: nodal and resolution/contrast testing. Nodal testing provides measures of focal length, the Seidal aberrations (spherical, coma, distortion, etc.), blur size, principal plane location, and magnification. Resolution/Contrast testing ascertains the ability of the lens to measure detail. MTF is the most prominent of this type of testing.
Lens Testing: The Measurement of MTF
Today’s new technologies for designing and producing complex, high quality optical systems require lens measurement equipment that is sophisticated, flexible and accurate.
Figure 5 – Edge Trace and MTF for a Selfoc Array
The MTF is a measure of the ability of an optical system to transfer various levels of detail from object to image. Performance is measured in terms of contrast (degrees of gray), or of modulation, produced for a perfect source of that detail level.
Transfer functions are found in circumstances where a response (output) is related to an input. Examples of systems that can be characterized by a response function are audio equipment, mechanical vibration isolation structures, and seismometers. The Optical Transfer Function (OTF) describes the response of optical systems to known input, and consists of two components — the MTF is the magnitude of the OTF and the phase transfer function (PTF) is the phase component.
The amount of detail in an image is given by the resolution of the optical system, and is customarily specified in line pairs per millimeter (lp/mm). A line pair is one cycle of a light bar and dark bar of equal width and has a contrast of unity. Contrast is defined as:
Contrast ≡ I _{Max} – I _{Min} / I _{Max} + I _{Min}
where I _{Max} is the maximum intensity produced by an image (white) and I _{Min} is the minimum intensity (black). MTF is a plot of contrast, measured in percent, against spatial frequency measured in lp/mm. This graph is customarily normalized to a value of 1 at zero spatial frequency (all white or black).
An eye test is a common MTF measurement. The ophthalmologist determines the response of the human visual system (lens and retina) to varying levels of detail – rows of letters. Hence, the doctor determines the frequency response of the patient’s visual system.
The Phase Transfer Function (PTF) is a measure of the relative phase in the image as function of frequency. A relative phase change of 180°, for example, indicates that black and white in the image are reversed. This phenomenon occurs when the OTF becomes negative. Phase reversed images still show contrast and may have a substantial MTF. Figure 6 shows the effects of phase reversal.
Figure 6 – Radial Target (left) and outoffocus image (right) showing phase reversal
The Role of MTF
MTF specifications are frequently used for lens designs that require repeatable test standards. Some examples are reconnaissance lenses, photographic objectives and IR systems. The MTF measurement instrument is also commonly used as a production quality control tool, since operators are not required to have a high level of optical training in order to properly test the optics.
The benefits of using MTF as a system specification are threefold. First, in many cases, optical systems employing numerous stages (lenses, film, eye, etc.) have a system MTF equal to the product of the MTF of the individual stage. This can be described as concat enation or cascading of MTF, and allows testing at a subassembly level.
Second, MTF can be specified either at a single wavelength or over a range of wavelengths, depending upon the application. Interferometric wavefront metrology is limited to certain laser wavelengths. MTF allows full spectrum specification and testing.
The third benefit of MTF testing is that it is objective and universal. The test engineer is not required to make judgments of contrast, resolution or image quality. Therefore, under the same conditions the polychromatic MTF of the lens can be directly compared to the polychromatic MTF of a design, or to another measurement instrument.
MTF Measurement Technologies
The are several methods for measuring MTF — discrete or continuous frequency generation, image scanning, and wavefront analysis. Recent advancements in precision mechanics and electrooptics technologies have produced many practical variations on these methods that allow efficient measurement of OTF to very high accuracy. Four major categories of instrumentation exist: frequency generation, scanning, video and interferometric methods.
Frequency Generation Methods
The most direct test of MTF is to use an object that consists of a pattern having a single spatial frequency, imaged by the Lens under Test. The operator measures the contrast of the image directly. This is a discrete or singlefrequency measurement. Discrete frequency measurement methods are commonplace. Examples are bar charts, the USAF 1951 resolution targets, and eye charts. A series of such tests can be used to create a graph of MTF over a range of spatial frequencies.
Various mechanisms have been developed for continuously varying the source frequen cies while constantly measuring the image contrast. One example of this approach utilizes a rotating radial grating with a slit aperture as an object. A pinhole is placed in the focal plane of the lens and the light passing through it is monitored with a detector. As the grating rotates, the individual black and white bars are swept across the pinhole. By moving the grating relative to the slit, the spatial frequencies of the object can be varied. The detector output is synchronized to the rotation and is a direct measure of the MTF at the radial grating spatial frequency and its harmonics.
The obvious advantage of frequency generation methods is the fact that the output is directly measured. The major disadvantage is that these methods require the simultaneous manipulation of sources and detectors, which limits instrument flexibility.
Scanning Methods
Most commercially available MTF measurement instruments use a form of image scanning. Scanning systems operate on the principles of linear system theory — the image produced by the lens with a known input, such as an infinitesimally small pinhole, is determined and the MTF is computed from this information.
Measuring MTF with this method is the optical analogy of measuring the frequency response of an audio speaker. The image produced by a lens of an infinitely small source of light will be a blur, much as the output of a speaker with a single input audio frequency will be tonal. The qualities of the blur similarly indicate the frequency response of the lens.
The spatial profile of the image is called the line spread function (LSF) if the scanning is onedimensional, or the point spread function (PSF) for twodimensional scanning. An LSF is commonly produced by edgescanning an image of a point source with a mechanical obscuration (knifeedge) while monitoring the intensity throughput, and then differentiating the output. It can also be produced by using a slit source and moving a pinhole or slit. The vertical or horizontal orientation of the knife determines whether sagittal or tangential scanning is achieved. If the knifeedge possesses a right angle and is diagonally traversed across the image, it will sequentially scan in the horizontal and vertical directions, yielding both sagittal and tangential edge traces. The Fourier transform of the LSF is the onedimensional MTF.
In order for a true impulse response function to be derived, the finite source size must be corrected. Through linear system theory, it can be shown that this correction consists of dividing the measured MTF by the Fourier transform of the source, such that the corrected MTF data is the quotient of the uncorrected MTF data divided by the proper correction factor at discrete frequencies:
MTF (f) = MTF_{uncorrected} (f) / Correction (f)
Computer algorithms quickly correct measured MTF data for finite aperture sizes (slits, pinholes, etc.). The fully corrected data can then be compared to the theoretical performance.
Throughfocus MTF mapping can be generated by remeasuring the MTF at different focus planes. The effects of spherical aberration, defocus, astigmatism, field curvature and chromatic aberration can be determined from these curves. By choosing a single spatial frequency and comparing the MTF at these focal planes, the focus for best (or balanced) performance can be determined. The last two frames of Figure 5 show the benefits of throughfocus scanning.
Very high resolution (without image magnification) can now be achieved with scanning systems equipped with precision lead screws driven by stepper motors or accurate synchronous motors.
A drawback to image scanning methods is the duration of scan. Sampling theory and the parameters of the Lens Under Test dictate the number of data points required for a properly sampled image. Insufficient sampling can significantly affect the accuracy of the MTF. Often, a long image scan will require upwards of 30 seconds measurement time.
Video Methods
Video methods are subject to the same theoretical considerations as the scanning methods. Typically, a solid state array is placed at the focal plane of the lensundertest. If a pinhole source is used, the point spread function can be directly obtained from the digitized video output. The twodimensional OTF is obtained by directly Fourier transforming this data in two dimensions. Edge traces and line spread functions can be obtained by integrating the pointspread function. If a slit source is used, the linespread function is obtained directly and the OTF is calculated by performing a onedimensional Fourier transform of this. In either case, the MTF is given by the modulus of the OTF.
The advantage of video MTF measurement lies in the speed with which it can be accomplished. The MTF can be updated as quickly as the solid state array can be electronically sampled and the Fourier transform calculated. This provides a continuously updated spread function and MTF curve.
Video systems are very useful for alignment of optical systems specified by MTF data. An operator can move an optical component or assembly and monitor the effects of that perturbation on the MTF.
The drawbacks of video methods are inherent in the design of electronic solid state arrays. Since detector element sizes are finite and on the order of many microns, the maximum resolvable frequency is approximately 30 – 80 lp/mm. This problem can be circumvented by adding an optical relay system to magnify the image onto the array. However, the relay optics must be very high quality, must have a very high numerical aperture to capture the entire output of fast lenses or systems working at high offaxis angles, and should be essentially diffraction limited to not impact the measured MTF.
Pixel to pixel crosstalk, both optical and electrical, tend to increase the apparent image size and affect the measured MTF. The MTF should be corrected for these effects. High speed video digitizing boards commonly digitize with 8bit precision. The illumination on the video camera must be controlled so as not to saturate pixels or cause blooming. The accuracy of the computed MTF is limited by the level of digitizing. Eightbit video MTF systems are less accurate than conventional scanning systems. However, with the right application, videosampling methods are valuable.
Interferometric Methods
The MTF of a system may be measured with an interferometer by one of two methods: autocorrelating the pupil function of the lensundertest or analyzing the PSF calculated by Fourier transforming the pupil wavefront. This is very convenient for systems which are suitable for testing in an interferometer and do not exhibit significant chromatic aberrations, and whose wavefront errors do not vary substantially over the wavelength of interest. With scanning, video or discrete frequency methods, the wavelength range can be adjusted by using wide band sources and spectral filters for full polychromatic testing. Interferometers rely on monochromatic sources (i.e. lasers) so that MTF is only available at these wavelengths.
In addition, since phase measuring interferometers have limited wavefront sampling capabilities, the wavefront should be fairly well corrected. Lenses with excessive wavefront errors are difficult to measure with interferometers.
Special Problems and Solutions
 Nonisoplanatic Systems (coherent fiber optics and image intensifiers). Fiberoptic face plates and image intensifiers are examples of nonisoplanatic optical systems where a small translation of the object does not result in a linearly related translation of the The MTF of coherent fiber optic bundles, for example, can vary significantly depending upon whether the LSF is computed along a row of fibers, across a row of fibers or bridging a row of fibers. The theoretical limit of MTF is also affected in a similar manner. Other factors which will affect the MTF values are packing density, pixel size (fiber diameter), crosstalk and transmission.
 Testing of systems which violate the isoplanatic condition require unique assumptions to qualify their performance. For example, the orientation of the bundle must be specified with regards to the scan axis. The width of the object (pinhole or slit, for example) will indicate the amount of pixel illumination and hence the theoretical maximum achievable levels of
 Lens Arrays. Optical arrays include a broad category of precisely placed lens elements whose overall performance is the sum of the individual The Selfoc® gradientindex array is perhaps the most common array of this category and is frequently found in imaging devices such as copiers and fax machines.
 Measuring the MTF of an array requires careful analysis of the test conditions due to the unique qualities of the array. Since each image is formed by more than one array element, the depthoffocus is small. Large amounts of longitudinal chromatic aberration make spectral considerations very important. Figure 5 shows typical Selfoc® array MTF and throughfocus
 Image and Film Analysis. Measuring the quality of a photographic emulsion or other hard copy image is easily performed with MTF testing. The object being testing is re imaged into an MTF analyzer to establish the lensfilm system response. This allows comparison of performance of different films and processing methods as well as thermal and transfer
 IR Systems. Measuring MTF in the infrared has become nearly as commonplace as measuring MTF in the visible. Most IR measurements involve physical scanning apertures very similar to visible measurement scanners in both the 35µ m and 8 12µ m spectral
Despite use of sensitive IR detectors and high temperature blackbodies, the most significant challenge facing IR measurements is the signal/noise ratio. Thermal background emissions coupled with “slow” lenses (those having a large f/#) raise noise and reduce signal levels. The choice of source (slit or pinhole) dimensions is determined by the maximum frequency of interest and the magnification of the Lens Under Test. For example, if the magnification of the optical system is 0.1X, a 200µ m pinhole diameter or slit width will allow bandlimited testing to 25 lp/mm. If frequencies beyond this limit are desired, the source area must be decreased, and the signaltonoise will decrease by a corresponding amount.
Another problem in IR system testing is finding and precisely locating the image. With out some automatic or systematic methods for finding the image, tests are time and patienceconsuming.
The benefits of using MTF as both a design and manufacturing tool lie in its objectivity. Full polychromatic testing of a wide variety of optical systems is possible using MTF testing methods such as edge scanning, video and discrete frequency targets. The MTF can be used to characterize the most demanding and precise optical systems, from photo lithographic to ophthalmic.
Modulation Transfer Function
The black box response to known inputs
The concepts of resolution and contrast are frequently confused and incorrectly inter changed.
Resolution relates to detectability. The resolution required of a visual optical system is different than for photographic optical systems, for example. Resolution specifications are therefore specified for each application.
The resolution specification for a visual optical system is often specified using the “point where radial and tangential lines are not resolvable to the viewer” in a visual optical system. The prime example of this is the ophthalmic eye chart.
Figure 7 – Eye Chart (Not to Scale)
The resolution for a real imageforming optical system (a microscope objective or an eye piece, for example) is again specified by asking an observer to identify the point at which a bar chart becomes unresolvable.
Figure 8 — USAF 1951 Resolution Target (not to Scale)
Frequency(lp / mm) = 2 {Group +(Element 1) 6 }
Cutoff resolution is defined as the frequency at which the contrast of an image is reduced to zero. In other words, it is frequency at which the MTF drops to zero.
Contrast is synonymous with modulation, and is most commonly defined as:
Contrast ≡ I _{Max} – I _{Min} / I _{Max} + I _{Min}
Here Imax is the maximum intensity in the image and Imin is the minimum intensity. Intensity is measured as W/cm2 (irradiance) by a detector.
Consider, for example, a “picket fence” object (alternating light and dark bars with sharp edges) and the human eye as the optical system. The pickets are spaced in a 50% duty cycle with 100% contrast – half on and off, fully white and black. As the width of the pickets is decreased from 3 inches to smaller values, the image produced on the retina will not only get smaller, but the sharp edges between the white and black bars will begin to blur, the white bars will get darker, and the black bars lighter.
Figure 9 – Decrease in Contrast in an Image
At some small spacing, the picket fence will “wash out” to a uniform gray image. At this frequency the modulation depth is zero. This is the limit of detectability, or resolution.
The Theory of MTF
The Optical Transfer Function (OTF) describes the response of optical systems to known sources and is composed of two components: the Modulation Transfer Function and the Phase Transfer Function.
The MTF can be described as a map of modulation versus spatial frequency of a spatially varying source. The spatial frequency is defined as the inverse of the spatial period of the sinosoid.
MTF and the Transfer Function for Incoherent Light
When an optical system produces an image using perfectly incoherent light, then the function which describes the intensity in the image plane produced by a point in the object plane is called the Impulse Response Function. This impulse response usually is written h(x,y; x1,y1). The input (object intensity pattern) and output (image intensity pattern) are related by the simple convolution equation:
g(x, y) = f (x1 , y1 )* h(x, y; x1 , y1 )
This is more formally written as:
g( x, y) = òò f (x1 , y1 )h( x – x1 , y – y1 )dx1dy1
However, convolutions can be very computationally intensive. The answer to solving this math equation lies in Fourier Transform theory. A Fourier Transform converts information in the space domain into frequency information, where it can be described as a linear combination of appropriately weighted sines and cosines.
Convolutions in the space domain correlate with multiplications in the frequency domain. Therefore, if
then
g( x, y) = f (x1 , y1 ) * h(x, y; x1 , y1 )
G( f x , f y ) = {F ( f , f )}{H (f , f )}
where G(fx,fy), F(fx,fy), and H(fx,fy) are Fourier Transforms of g(x,y), f(x1,y1), and h(x,y;x1,y1).The function H(fx,fy) is called the Transfer Function, and in the case of optical systems, it is the Optical Transfer Function, or OTF.
The OTF is a complex function, composed of real and imaginary parts:
OTF ( f ) = H ( f x , f y ) e
The real portion, or H(fx,fy) is called the Modulation Transfer Function, or MTF, and the function f(f) is termed the Phase Transfer Function. The MTF is normalized to unity at zero spatial frequency.
Note:
At this juncture we would like to point out that the OTF and MTF provide the frequency response of an input sinusoidal waveform, not the response of sharpedged square wave “bar targets”. Virtually all MTF calculations and measurements are based on this method of computing the transfer ability of the optical system. The use of square wave bar targets is not commonly used today. It is useful to know that, under the appropriate conditions, the square wave response can be used to obtain the sine wave response.
How to obtain the transfer function
Since it is impossible to construct a truly infinitesimal source, one cannot directly measure the response of a system to a point impulse. The impulse response (and hence the transfer function) must be derived rather than generated. It can be generated by one of two methods:
 use of an “apparently infinitely small input” such as 2 µm pinhole with f/20 system
 convert the source function and the image function into functions in the frequency domain, then divide transform of the image function by the transform of the source function to yield the transfer function. The inverse Fourier Transform of the transfer function yields the impulse
Figure 10 – Calculation of the Optical Transfer Function in Incoherent Light
Cascading MTF’s
Under appropriate conditions, the MTF of a system can be calculated by “cascading” the MTFs of the component systems. In other words, one can construct the MTF of the composite system at any frequency by multiplying together the MTFs of each of the components at that same frequency:
Figure 12 – “Cascading” the MTFs of lens and film to obtain the camera MTF
Cascading is useful in calculating the effects of camera systems – Lens + Film or Lens + CCD. In general, one cannot simply multiply the incoherent MTFs of all the lenses in a multielement system and obtain the correct MTF for the system, even if the lenses are all wellcorrected and pupils are matched. This point has been made several times in the literature (DeVelis and Parrent 1967; Swing 1974). It can also be justified by a simple thought experiment – imagine a system in which an object is imaged by one lens. One then positions a second lens to reimage the initial image as a second image. The lenses are perfect and aberrationfree and introduce no reflection or absorption losses. The MTF of the system should not be the square of the MTF of a single lens – the lenses are perfect by definition, and the frequency cutoff is imposed by the first lens. The MTF should not be made worse by the second lens, which is identical to the first. One can imagine a chain of as many of these lenses as one wants. Multiplying their individual MTFs together would constrict the MTF at any frequency to as low as value as we want (all we have to do is add more lenses). But the true system MTF is determined by the initial lens, and not degraded by any of the subsequent relay lenses. As Swing points out, it is the pupil function of the lenses that are cascaded, and the system MTF is determined from this cascaded pupil function. No simple relationship exists between the cascaded transfer functions and the correct transfer function calculated from the cascaded pupil functions.
A corollary of this line of thought is that the lens with the poorest Numerical Aperture will determine the cutoff frequency, and the lens with the worst pupil function will most influence the system MTF.
One can cascade the MTFs of different system components, provided that all the cascaded systems are linear. In other words, the systems can be cascaded if the response at a particular frequency is linearly proportional to the input signal amplitude. This will be the case with photographic film near the middle of the HD curve, but not at the ends, or with a CCD at moderate illumination levels, but not near saturation.(Nelson, Eisen, and Higgins 1968)
Phase Transfer Function
The phase transfer function (PTF) describes the relative phases of the sinusoids of different frequency making up the transform. A nonzero phase indicates shift and/or repetition in the image. For example, consider a onedimensional system in which the response to a delta function object is an image that consists of two spots in the image plane separated by a distance x0. Since the input object is a point or impulse, this image is the impulse response, and the Fourier Transform of it is the Optical Transform Function (OTF).
This twospot image can be represented mathematically by:
f ( x) = rect(x) + rect( x – x0 )
Here the rectangle function rect(x) is defined by:
rect( x) º 1 x £ 1
rect( x) º 0 x > 1
Since the object input is a point, a perfect impulse, the transfer function is simply the Fourier Transform of the image function. This is given by:
If the impulse response had only consisted of a single spot (so that f(x) = rect(x)), then the transfer function would only consist of a “sinc” function h(fx)= [sin(pfx)]/ (pfx). The presence of the second spot leads to the phase term through the “shift” theorem of Fourier Transforms.
Using the definition of the Phase Transform function:
we can use the last equation above to derive f(fx) = –pfxx0,confirming that a linear shift in position leads to a corresponding linear shift in phase.
Phase reversals occur when the modulation (and the PTF) changes sign. In this case, whites turn black and blacks turn white. The classic example of Phase Reversal is a radial target with alternating black and white “pie” segments, viewed through a somewhat Defocused (but otherwise perfect) lens. At a certain radial distance from the center the contrast disappears, and the color is a uniform gray. Within that circle the black and white segments are the reverse of what they are outside that circle.
Figure 13 — The classic phase reversal example
Coherent Transfer Function
The discussion above has assumed that the imaging has been performed using an incoherent light source. This is generally the most useful type of measurement, since most imaging applications use incoherent light (natural sunlight, tungsten bulbs, etc.) For the case of incoherent illumination the impulse response function relates the object intensity to the image intensity. The Optical Transfer Function is the Fourier Transform of this impulse response function.
Imaging may also be performed using coherent light, or partially coherent light. In these cases the image response must be calculated in a different fashion. For the case of coherent illumination the impulse response function that is used relates the object illumination amplitude to the illumination amplitude of the image. (The intensity is proportional to the square of the modulus of the amplitude.) The coherent optical transfer function is the Fourier Transform of this amplitude impulse response function, and is thus quite different from the incoherent optical transfer function. The two are mathematically related (See Goodman 1968 p. 115). The cutoff frequency for the incoherent OTF is twice that of the coherent OTF. This does not mean that incoherent imaging transfers more information than coherent imaging (Goodman 1968, pp. 125133)
The case of partially coherent light is much more complex. Instead of working with either the complex amplitude of the light or its intensity, we must measure a property called the mutual intensity, and the relevant transfer function describes the propagation of the mutual intensity through the optical system. A discussion of this is beyond the scope of the present booklet. The interested reader is directed to sources such as Born and Wolf’s Principles of Optics, chapter 10.
Strehl Ratio
The Strehl ratio is a useful singlenumber relationship between the actual MTF of a real lens and the diffraction limited system MTF performance. It is sometimes simply referred to as the “Strehl” of the system (after K. Strehl, who first suggested it in 1902). It is defined by:
This is simply the ratio of the area under the MTF curve to the area under the diffraction limited MTF curve. By Parseval’s theorem this is also the ratio of the irradiance in the center of the diffraction pattern to the center intensity of a diffractionlimited Airy disk.
The presence of aberrations reduces the Strehl ratio below its ideal value of 1. For small aberrations the Strehl ratio is given approximately by:
Here (DOPD)2 is the mean square error in the Optical Path Difference (from that of a perfect spherical wave). It does not matter exactly what form the aberrations take, as long as they are small.
Strehl ratio is sometimes improperly used to identify the “percentage of diffraction limited performance” of an optical system, sometimes called XDL, or “Times (“X”) the Diffraction Limit”. The relationship between the Strehl ratio and the “XDL” value relies upon the assumption that aberrations act to broaden the size of the diffraction spot, having no other effect. This is not, in fact, true. It is approximately true if the aberrations are small. In general, however, this term does not compensate for full conditions of the tests and should be contextlimited.
Diffractionlimited MTF of a Circular Lens
The diffractionlimited incoherent MTF for a lens having a circular pupil is given by:
Figure 14 – MTF for a DiffractionLimited Lens having a circular aperture
This holds true for f £ f0. Outside that region, MTF(f) = 0. There is no subscript x or y on the frequency, since this holds true for all radial directions. The incoherent cutoff frequency f0 is defined by:
Here D is the lens diameter (actually the Entrance Pupil diameter), l is the wavelength (usually one uses 0.55 microns, the peak of human visual response in ordinary daylight), and efl is the focal length of the lens. Note that (efl)/D = f/# of the lens for an infinitely distant object.
MTF of a Defocused Lens
Defocus is one of the most common aberrations encountered. Its effect on MTF can be calculated mathematically (see, for instance, Goodman 1968 section 64). The MTF at zero frequency is always normalized to a value of unity, and the initial slope at zero frequency is always the same. The MTF is zero at (and beyond) the cutoff frequency. The effect of any aberration is to make the value of the MTF smaller for frequencies between zero and the cutoff. As the following plot shows, the OTF drops most rapidly in the mid frequency values first. The OTF may even become negative, as in curve #5. At this point we will see the “phase reversal” noted above, where black bars or sectors appear to be white, and vice versa. (The MTF, being the modulus of the OTF, is never negative, but when the OTF becomes negative the Phase Transfer Function will change sign.). Notice that the OTF may actually increase again at certain frequencies as the amount of defocus is increased. Nevertheless, the effect of increasing aberration is generally to degrade the image quality. The MTF of an aberrated system is never as high as that of a diffraction limited system.
Figure 15 – OTF of a DiffractionLimited Lens at Different Amounts of Defocus
MTF Measurement Methods
Wavefront Autocorrelation
The autocorrelation of a wavefront (as given by the pupil function of the optical system) will yield the OTF of a coherent optical system. This technique is commonly used in interferometers and lens design programs. The pupil function is autocorrelated (convolved with itself) to yield the OTF.
Lens design programs perform this auto correlation by preparing a 2dimensional pupil map. This map of the Optical Path Difference (OPD) at various locations in the pupil is then autocorrellated to yield the OTF
Figure 16 – Sample pupil map
Interferometers treat the system in much the same manner. Instead of using the theoretically determined OPD maps as the input, however, phase measurements obtained from an interferometer provides the input. A computer is then used to perform an autocorrelation of this phase map with itself to produce the OTF.
Image Analysis
Image analysis MTF measurement instruments use linear system theory to derive the transfer function from the spatial information of the image and the object. The information is converted to frequency domain by a Fast Fourier Transform (or other Fourier Transform technique).
There are two basic categories of commercially available instruments dedicated to measurement of MTF of optical systems using image analysis: physical scanners and video scanners.
Physical scanners use a mechanical knifeedge to generate a spatial distribution of the image plane. This method was first explored at the University of Rochester and published by R. Klimasewski in a masters thesis in 1967.
A physical scanner operates by:
 Sliding a surface over an image to create a line spread The options of surfaces are:
 pinhole and knife blade
 slit and knife blade
 pinhole and slit
 The LSF is the spatial information f(x1,y1) describing the The Fourier Transform of the LSF yields the image function, G(ƒx), in frequency space.
 By dividing the image function G(ƒx) by the corresponding onedimensional object function transform, F(ƒx), the transfer function H(ƒx) is determined.
Measuring MTF using a KnifeEdge Scanner
Figure 17 –Schematic of MTF test bench using knifeedge scanner
 Light entering from the left side is produced by a collimator, which consists of a pinhole uniformly illuminated by light from a source and placed at the focal point of a good quality, wellcorrected
 An image is produced by the Lens Under Test (LUT). For a reliable test, the size of the image one would predict by geometrical optics (pinhole size X focal length of LUT/focal length of collimator) should be significantly smaller than the size of the diffraction spot produced by the The smallest diffraction spot measures 2.44 l (f/#).
 Image is scanned using a “knife edge” sliding in one dimension. The light not intercepted by the edge is gathered by the relay lens and directed onto a detector. The resulting signal as a function of knife edge position is the 1dimensional Edge Response. The derivative of this with respect to the knife edge position is the Line Spread Function (LSF). As noted above, the Fourier Transform of the LSF yields the OTF, and the modulus of this gives the
 The MTF obtained in this fashion is the “uncorrected” MTF, since it was obtained using a finite pinhole. The effect of a pinhole of diameter a can be removed by dividing the “uncorrected” MTF by the Fourier Transform of the pinhole
Data Sampling rate
If the functional form of data that we wish to measure has no components beyond a certain frequency, then that function is said to be bandwidth limited. The function can be recreated exactly from a finite series of discrete measurements, provided these measurements meet certain criteria. In order to recreate a function from a series of data points, the measuring system must sample that data at a rate greater than twice its maximum frequency. This frequency (twice the maximum frequency of the sample) is called the Nyquist frequency.
The simplest case is a sine wave. In order to properly sample sine wave of frequency f, we must gather data at a frequency of at least 2f. A common interpretation is that this enables proper sampling of the wave by enabling the measuring device to observe one wave and one trough.
If the frequencies contained in the data being sampled are greater than the maximum sampling frequency, then one can get false results. As a very crude example, a sine wave of frequency fx that starts at zero will have a maximum value of 1 at fxx = p/2 and a minimum value of –1 at fxx = 3p/2. But a sine wave of opposite sign and frequency 3fx will also have its minimum and maximum at the same values of fxx = p/2 and fxx = 3p/2. The two situations look alike (which is why the effects of this situation are called aliasing), and applying the same mathematics to such a case where it does not apply results in errors.
Figure 18 – Aliasing – the lower frequency sine wave is being sampled at its Nyquist Frequency; the highfrequency sine wave is not being sufficiently sampled
In the case of real MTF measurements, if Dx represents the physical separation of the samples, then we must have:
where B is the bandwidth of the signal, or the maximum frequency of the MTF.
For example, if information to 1000 lp/mm is needed, then the maximum sample separation must be less than 0.0005mm = 0.5mm. Instruments today can achieve these frequencies with precision lead screws and motor drivers, or by other methods.
Other considerations with scanners
 Scan speed can be easily be made relatively slow for high frequency scans and for performing measurements in the infrared (Since the wavelength is longer in the infrared, the diffraction spots will be larger for a lens of given size than they will for the case of visible light. Such larger images take longer to scan).
 Very high accuracy is achievable
 With the same basic hardware, one can perform a variety of Where one has very little light, for instance, one can substitute a narrow slit for a small pinhole and obtain a Line Spread Function with a much greater Signal – to – Noise ratio. This sort of flexibility is very convenient for IR work and unique optical systems
 The scanner system works in the infrared exactly as it does in the visible. If the knife edge is a true sharp edge (rather than an opaque film on a substrate, for instance), the same scanner can be used as for the visible.
Video methods
Video capture of image data can be used for rapid measurement of the Point Spread Function, from which the MTF can be calculated. In this case there is no knife edge. The relay optic sends a magnified version of the image directly onto the CCD array. This acts like a series of detectors which discretely sample the entire image in one action.
 The PSF or LSF can be directly obtained from the digitized video output
 The OTF can be obtained directly by Fourier transforming this data
 Edge traces and line spread functions can be obtained by integrating the point spread function.
Considerations with video measurements
 The measurement is very fast. The MTF can be updated as quickly as the solid state array can be electronically sampled and the Fourier transform
 Video scanning is easy to The Optikos VideoMTF Measurement System is a good choice for alignment and relative measurements.
 Video scanning is subject to the same sampling criteria as knifeedge scanners. However, CCD array separations are seldom less than 6µ (corresponding to 80 lp/mm). Unlike knifeedge scanning, the operator cannot vary the size of the sampling “bin” by varying the speed of the sweep. Relay magnifiers are frequently added to boost the maximum test frequency. These must be of very high quality and very high numerical
 The dynamic range of the pixels is limited by the digitizing board, usually 8bit precision.
 Pixeltopixel crosstalk, both optical and electrical, tends to increase the apparent image size and affect the measured
 Pixel dimensions and relative pixel responsivity can drastically affect the These effects are commonly compensated for by creating a “white card response” of the video system to inversely map the responsivity.
 Infrared CCDs exist, but they are bulky, must be cooled, and are expensive.
Glossary of Common Terms in Optical System Measurement
Aerial Image Resolution:
The ability of the optical system to reproduce a series of light and dark bars into an image which can be viewed by an observer, usually with magnification. The USAF 1951 resolution target is utilized as a common aerial image resolution mechanism
Astigmatism:
Geometric aberration which causes the tangential and sagittal (also called radial) images to separate. The image of a point source (e.g. pinhole) becomes two separate lines and consequently causes image planes to separate from Petzval surface.
Cardinal Points:
The six “points” of a wellcorrected optical system which allow its characterization as a “black box”. The six points are: front and rear focal points, front and rear nodal points, and front and rear principal points. (In most cases of interest, where the medium on either side of the lens is the same, the principal points coincide with the nodal points).
Contrast Transfer Function:
See Modulation Transfer Function.
Cutoff Frequency:
The spatial frequency at which the transferred contrast of a diffraction limited (aberration free) optical system is reduced to zero. For a circularly symmetric diffraction limited system, the cutoff frequency fc is defined as:
Here l is the wavelength of the light used.
Distortion:
A geometric aberration which causes the image of an offaxis field point to be displaced from the paraxial image height (paraxial chief ray intersection on image plane). Third order distortion varies as the cubic of the image height. Overcorrected, or Pincushion, distortion defines images which are displaced further from the paraxial intersection; Undercorrected, or Barrel, distortion defines inward displacement.
Edge Trace:
Also known as Knife Energy Distribution. The map of the intensity of an image as a function of position (frequently normalized) of an obscuring knife blade slid through the image.
Field Curvature:
The curvature of the image plane caused by the indices of refraction and curvatures of the optical elements. In the absence of astigmatism only Petzval curvature exists.
Flare:
Nonimageforming light, concentrated or diffuse, that is transmitted through the lens to the image. It is frequently the result of reflections from lens surfaces, a lens barrel, shutter, or lens mount.
Focal Length:
The axial distance from the corresponding principal plane of a lens to the focal point. Effective focal length is the distance from the rear principal plane to focal pint and front focal length is the distance from the front principal plane to focal point. Back focal length is the distance from the vertex of the last lens element to the rear focal point.
Fourier Transform:
A closed form integration which decomposes spatial energy information into a series of sinusoidal functions which describe frequency content (frequency spectrum). The Fourier transform integral for a complex function g(x, y) is given by:
Isoplanatism:
The condition of an optical system which describes space invariance. An optical system is said to be space invariant if the image of a point source changes only in location, and not in shape, as the point source is moved in the object plane.
Limiting Resolution:
The spatial frequency at which the transferred modulation has fallen to a prescribed minimum level (usually zero) for an optical system. For a diffractionlimited optical system, the limiting resolution equals the cutoff frequency.
Line Spread Function:
The intensity distribution of an image, integrated in one dimension; can also be considered the intensity distribution of an image produced by a slit object. Also the derivative of the edge trace.
Modulation Transfer Function (MTF):
A measure of the ability of an optical system to transfer various levels of detail from object to image. Performance is measured in terms of contrast or modulation at a particular spatial frequency which is customarily specified in line pairs per millimeter. The MTF is normalized to unity (or 100%) contrast at zero spatial frequency. Also known as Sine Wave Response.
Nodal Bench:
An optical instrument which allows determination of the cardinal points of a lens utilizing the principal that a ray which passes through the first nodal point is imaged to the second nodal point at unit magnification and hence exits the lens at the same angle as the entering ray.
Optical Transfer Function:
The complex function which is the Fourier transform of the impulse response, whose modulus is the Modulation Transfer Function, and imaginary part contains the Phase Transfer Function.
Petzval Surface
The image of a plane surface at right angles to the optical axis is, in the absence of astigmatism, a paraboloidal surface called the Petzval surface.
Phase Transfer Function:
Function describing the variation of relative phase in the image of an optical system as a function of frequency. It is derived from the imaginary portion of the OTF:
tan[f(fx)] = [Im{h(fx)}]/[Re{h(fx)}]
Point Spread Function:
The 2dimensional intensity distribution about the image of a point source.
Star Testing
A test of an optical system, usually visual and semiquantitative, where the image of a point source formed by a lens is examined. The system performance, and aberration content, is judged by the departure of the image from an ideal diffraction limited image.
Strehl Ratio:
The ratio of the peak intensity of the central core of an image to the corresponding intensity contained in an image obtained in the absence of aberrations. The ratio may be computed by integrating the area under an MTF curve and dividing it by the integral over the diffractionlimited MTF.
Subjective Quality Factor (SQF)
A single number representation for the quality of a lens based on a photographic application. The SQF is derived from the logarithmic integration under the MTF curve in the final image plane. The actual limits of integration are computed by the magnification of the image plane to the final format’s size.
ThroughFocus MTF
A series of MTF measurements made over a range of positions in the vicinity of the focal point. It is used to analyze how the MTF varies with focus position.
Veiling Glare:
The amount of diffuse stray light scattered over image area. Veiling glare is usually measured using a central round black area within surrounding target.
Vignetting
The reduction is energy through an optical system due to the obstruction of rays or changes in the geometrical relation of the object, entrance pupil, exit pupil, and image.
(No author) “Modulation Transfer Function.” S.P.I.E Seminar Proceedings, Vol.13, 1969
(No Author) “New Test Patterns for Camera Lens Evaluation.” Applied Optics, June 1983
No Author) “Interferometer Accuracy and Precision.” S.P.I.E. QELase, 1987 Born, Max and Wolf, Emil Principles of Optics (fifth edition) Pergamon Press, 1975
De Vany, Arthur S. Master Optical Techniques. Wiley Series in Pure and Applied Optics, 1981
DeVelis, John B. and Parrent, George B. “Transfer Function for Cascaded Optical Systems” J. Opt. Soc. Am., 57, (12), 14861490, 1967
Gerchman, MC. “Testing Generalized Rotationally Symmetric Aspheric Optical Surfaces Using Reflective Null Compensating Components.” Proc. S.P.I.E., 676, 6065, 1987
Goodman, J.W. Introduction to Fourier Optics McGrawHill Physical and Quantum Electronics Series, 1968
Greivenkamp. J.E. “SubNyquist Interferometry.” Applied Optics, 26, 52455258, 1987 Kingslake, R. “Lens Testing Using a Nodalslide Bench”, OF&T Workshop. Toronto,
Canada, Oct. 1977
Kingslake, R. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 22, 207222, 1932
Klimasewski, Robert G. A Knife Edge Scanner to Measure The Optical Transfer Function Thesis, University of Rochester, 1967
Leistner, K., B. Marcus and B.W. Wheeler. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 43, 4448, 1953
Malacara, Daniel. Optical Shop Testing. Wiley Series in Pure and Applied Optics, 1978 Nelson, C.N., Eisen, F.C., and Higgins, G.C. “Effect of Nonlinearities when Applying
Modulation Transfer Techniques to Photographic Systems” Modulation Transfer Function, Proc. S.P.I.E. 13, 127134, 1968
Palum, R.J. “Surface Profile Measurements for Small Rotationally Symmetric Surfaces.”
Proc. S.P.I.E., 966, 138149, 1989
Shannon, R.R. Applied Optics and Optical Engineering, Volume III, Academic Press 183229, 1965
Smith, Warren J. Modern Optical Engineering. McGrawHill, 1966
Swing, Richard E. “The Case for the Pupil Function” Image Assessment and Specification, Proc. S.P.I.E., 46, 104113, 1974
Traux, B.E. “Absolute Interferometric Testing of Spherical Surfaces.” Proc. S.P.I.E., 966, 130137, 1989
Williams, C. and O. Becklund, Introduction to the Optical Transfer Function, Wiley Series in Pure and Applied Optics, 1989